Mamak Malaysian Restaurant Operators Accused of Underpaying Staff
Friday 19 May 2017 @ 9.36 a.m. | Industrial Law | Trade & Commerce
The operators of an inner-Sydney restaurant who were penalised almost $300,000 for exploiting overseas workers in 2016, are again facing legal action, accused of further underpayments.
The Fair Work Ombudsman (the Ombudsman) has commenced legal action in the Federal Circuit Court against the operators of the Mamak Malaysian Restaurants, alleging they deliberately short-changed two Sydney employees and used false records to try to disguise the underpayments.
Facing Court are Joon Hoe Lee, Julian Lee and Alan Wing-Keung Au – who are the owner-operators of two Mamak restaurants in Sydney and one in Melbourne – and their company Mamak Pty Ltd.
Background to the Action
The latest action relates to allegations that two workers at the Mamak restaurant at Chatswood (Sydney), who worked between 2014 and 2016, were paid as little as $12 and $13 an hour, resulting in underpayments of their minimum hourly rates, casual loadings and penalty rates for weekend, public holiday and late night work. One employee was an Australian citizen and worked as a waiter, while the other employee was a waitress from Singapore working in Australia on student and bridging visas.
The Investigation
The Ombudsman investigated the complaints and now alleges Joon Hoe Lee, Julian Lee and Alan Wing-Keung Au and Mamak Pty Ltd were involved in further contravening workplace laws by providing inspectors with false records purporting to show that the two employees had been paid much higher rates than was actually the case. Contraventions of pay slip and record keeping laws are also alleged.
The litigation comes after the Ombudsman in 2016 secured $294,848 in penalties against the men and their company for underpaying six employees at the Mamak restaurant at Haymarket (Sydney). In this case the employees (including five visa-holders) were paid as little as $11 an hour, resulting in more than $87,000 in underpayments under the Restaurant Industry Award, from 2012 to 2015.
Joon Hoe Lee, Julian Lee and Alan Wing-Keung Au face penalties of up to $10,800 per contravention and Mamak Pty Ltd faces penalties of up to $54,000 per contravention.
The Judgment
In handing down the penalties, Smith J said that:
The Mamak operators admitted the contraventions in the first proceedings in 2016, back-paid those employees and gave sworn evidence in Court that their business had changed its practices to ensure future compliance.
The Ombudsman alleges the underpayment of the two employees occurred while the first proceedings were before the Court and alleges other contraventions - including failing to comply with notices to produce and knowingly providing false records, occurred even after the penalties were imposed.
Reaction from the Ombudsman
Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James says it is concerning that there has been cause to initiate court action for a second time against a business owner, once again alleging underpayment of vulnerable workers.
Ms James says her agency is strongly committed to taking pro-active action to improve compliance in the hospitality industry, noting that the National Hospitality Industry Campaign finalised in 2016 resulted in more than $2 million being recovered for underpaid employees in the hospitality industry across Australia.
Ms James said:
The Ombudsman is also seeking Court Orders requiring Mamak Pty Ltd to provide the Ombudsman with accurate pay records and to rectify the underpayments. Also, an injunction restraining Joon Hoe Lee, Julian Lee, Alan Wing-Keung Au and Mamak Pty Ltd from underpaying workers in future is also being sought. If the injunction is granted, they could face contempt of court proceedings if further underpayments are proven in court.
TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.
Sources:
Malaysian restaurant operators back in Court – fairwork.gov.au