ACT Introduces Bill to Combat Proceeds of Organised Crime
Friday 28 February 2020 @ 11.19 a.m. | Crime | Legal Research
On 20 February 2020, the Confiscation of Criminal Assets (Unexplained Wealth) Amendment Bill 2020 (the “Bill”) was presented to ACT’s Legislative Assembly (the “Assembly”) by Gordon Ramsay MLA (the Attorney-General). The Bill is currently before the Assembly.
The Bill proposes extensive amendments to the Confiscation of Criminal Assets Act 2003 (ACT).
Background
The Bill’s Explanatory Statement (the “ES”) indicates that the Bill proposes the establishment of a local “unexplained wealth scheme for the ACT”. The purpose of introducing such a scheme, according to the ES is “to more effectively deter and disrupt serious criminal activity, including organised crime, and ensure those involved in such crime do not profit from their illegal activities.”
In a Media Release of February 2020, the Minister said:
Independent Review into Policing in the ACT
In September 2019, the Justice and Community Safety Directorate engaged Dr Terry Goldsworthy to undertake an independent review of the effectiveness of ACT police powers to target, disrupt, investigate and prosecute criminal gang members. A key purpose of the review was to meet the statutory obligation for the Attorney-General to examine the operation of the crime scene powers in Division 10.4A of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) as soon as practicable after the end of the first year of operation of that division.
On 6 December 2019, Dr Goldsworthy finalised a report on the findings and recommendations of the review, with the Attorney-General tabling the final report in the Assembly on 20 February 2020.
As indicated in the Executive Summary to the Review:
The Proposed Amendments
The Bill, according to the ES, proposes the introduction of two types of orders which can be sought in relation to instances of unexplained wealth:
- an unexplained wealth restraining order - is an interim order that restrict a person’s ability to dispose of, or otherwise deal with, property. These provisions ensure that property is preserved and cannot be dissipated before a court can consider whether an unexplained wealth order should be made. A court must make an unexplained wealth restraining order if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a person’s total wealth exceeds the value of the person’s wealth that was lawfully acquired and the whole or any part of the person’s wealth was derived from serious criminal activity; and
- an unexplained wealth order - is a final order that makes payable to the Territory an amount which, in the court’s opinion, constitutes the difference between a person’s total wealth and the value of the person’s wealth that has been lawfully acquired. The court has a discretion to refuse to make an order or reduce the amount payable.
Comment on the Bill
The Minister commented in his second reading speech that the Bill is one of many measures taken by the ACT Government to target and disrupt serious and organised crime. In the Minister's view, unexplained wealth legislation "strike[s] at the heart of serious criminal offending" by allowing the seizure, restraint and forfeiture of the assets of those who cannot prove that their wealth was not the result of serious criminal activity.
TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.
Sources:
Confiscation of Criminal Assets (Unexplained Wealth) Amendment Bill 2020 [ACT] - Bill and supporting material available from TimeBase's LawOne Service
Media Release - Combating organised crime: Unexplained wealth (ACT Government, 20 February 2020)